There comes a time when a person knows something has to
change. At first what needs changing eludes identification. So much does need
changing it is hard to pick which gets our first attention.
For example, it’s time for the news. In years past this was
the late afternoon, pre-dinner cocktail hour. The 5 o’clock news, a scotch on
the rocks, a few cigarettes and the news to bring me up to date. What was
happening, how did the stocks end their day, how bad or good was the weather
today and what’s in store for tomorrow? You know the sort of thing.
Over time this ritual takes on a different meaning. The
cigarettes become unpleasant, unsatisfying; even the scotch loses its allure.
But the news? Brother, it drones on and on with less and less meaning or
timeliness. Boring. Predictable. Two-sided, maybe biased.
So changes were made. Fewer cigarettes was one change.
Scotches were counted. Then different news channels were tried. In the end it
came to the same disappointing result – the good was boring and the boring was
bad.
So, smoking was eliminated. So too the scotch.
These changes, however, did not save the news hour from
being boring. So the news was eliminated. No more TV news. What was reported
didn’t interest me and the why was always elusive but suggested anyway. I
searched for an alternative.
I found it in internet news items from trusted suppliers
(Associated Press reports, BBC items, New York Times articles, NPR and IPR
articles, etc.). I found these offerings complete with cited articles and
research papers. Data was present to be scanned. Research questions were posed
and partly answered. The unfolding weight of the stories were allowed their own
tempo.
In this way the evening news/cocktail hour was eliminated and
re-programmed.
Over time, say a year or two, other habits changed. More
novels were read. New non-fiction books were investigated. The mind was engaged
in finding perspective from a world of stimuli. Questions formed. Always with
an open ending – who? What? In what order? When? Why?
The questions were enough for a few years. Eventually,
however, they demanded a response rather than more searching. Foundational ideas were sought. Something that told
me what was important to me, what needed focus by others, and where we were
headed, not just me, but everyone on this planet.
I know, that’s a huge thought! Who am I to even pose the
question let alone wrap my head around the idea.
At some point, though, I had to do it. Pose the question and
idea. Don’t you do this as well?
As we mature I think it is natural to fit disparate ideas
and happenings into a shared context to better understand their meaning and
value.
I recall staring at a sunset. Ever changing in color and
intensity until fading slowly it disappears. What did I just witness? Was it
only for that string of moments or was it of long-term weight? The quick
response was it was for the moments only. And the ideas those moments called
forth in response.
Beholding beauty – view – vista – scenes – is an act all by
itself but it holds meaning and impact on our lives. It changes our thinking.
We build a world view from these moments. They change us. But when we
contemplate them seriously we are informed by them.
How often do we contemplate these matters? Are we
systematically piecing things together? Are we informed by our life experience?
Do we do this consciously and intentionally? If yes, great! If not, why not?
Perhaps now is the time to contemplate what it all means.
Maybe it is time we took a stab at understanding our lives and what’s
happening?
I’ve been doing this for some time now; still need to do
more but more importantly, I need to extract more understanding from this
process.
How about you?
March 17, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment