I’m a little confused here. News reports and internet web
home pages are asking questions like – “Should any cop who didn’t enter the
Florida high school where there was an active shooter, be fired?” and “Should
the Florida sheriff policing the shooting site be removed from office?”
In response, I say, Why, should I have a voice on this? It
isn’t in my expertise. An opinion, sure; I have one of those, well, maybe
several! But none of them have any validity as to dispensing fairness, judgment
or understanding concerning the Parkland, Florida shooting.
A jury in a court room is guided by the sitting judge, and
protected by the court staff, while attorneys involved with the case are
supervised closely by the judge and each other to protect the rights of the
defendant and the American jurisprudence system. Our justice system is built on
facts, process and fairness. It gets it right most of the time, but failures do
happen. Care, however, is exercised to protect that fairness.
So why would news organizations seek public input on such
issues? That is not news. It is not fact. It is opinion.
The tragedy at Parkland is multi-dimensional. The students
forced to live through the harrowing event represent one element of the
tragedy. The 17 dead victims are another element. The many wounded and scarred
for life are yet another element.
Still, other elements exist: parents and families of the
students, all of them; neighborhoods surrounding the school property; the
community of Parkland, all of it; the county of Broward and its people;
southern region of Florida is yet another affected element. Then there are the
first responders who were stationed there, those that came in response, those
who supported the responders in roles we never see (supervision, trainers,
dispatchers, radio personnel, equipment managers and fleet support services.
3200 students on site at the campus including all grade
levels. Responders by the hundreds. News crews with their support crews and
equipment. Choppers flying overhead. And parents and neighbors concerned about
the event as it unfolded, all of these people were on site or nearby. Sounds
like chaos to me; a lot of confusion, fear, excitement, shock, and adrenaline.
That environment does not bode well for human actions in the
best of circumstances. And we who were not there are being asked questions
judging others who were there and shouldering the crisis personally?
I’m proud of the responders and the jobs they all do in
horrible surroundings. They do what the rest of us would never volunteer for.
They are our heroes whether they perform perfectly or not. We were not there.
We do not know. And I for one will not pass judgment on the poor sole who was
assigned as the officer on duty at the school. He resigned under pressure. Now
it looks as though he did a credible job regardless of the pressure.
The sheriff has a large staff patrolling all the land mass
of the county. And he administers the police function as well as organizational
management of his large department. Passing judgment on him at a time like this
is not the job of the public. It should be in the capable hands of experienced
investigators and professionals who know much better than we civilians how this
should be judged. Let them do their jobs.
Meanwhile, let’s minister to the needs of a frazzled local
community and its people, especially the students at all the area schools. All
of them are at risk from crazies who burst into schools.
But they are not the only crazies we need to watch for! No,
there are many we should be alert and ready for. Let’s not be part of the crazy
action by jumping in with our opinions that are mostly ill-informed.
March 2, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment