I counsel teen drug addicts every Wednesday evening. I’m
looking for critical causes in their life to understand why they did what they
did. What led them to drugs and chaos?
I wonder about school shootings; why did the shooter do what
he did? What led him to this specific path?
A youthful life of crime – burglary, auto theft, rape – what
led these youth to such behavior?
The cause is the object in this wondering. Finding the cause
will help me understand why these people did what they did, and continue to do
what they do. It doesn’t answer the question of what we do about it now. No,
that is a public safety question; it is also a question of redemption or
rehabilitation as well.
Learning causation is the first step in understanding the
behavior. That understanding helps communicate with the individual miscreant.
Hopefully this will lead to constructive conversations that will guide the
person toward a more fulfilling life. That outcome would be good for him/her and
for the rest of our society, too. After all is said and done, that is the desired outcome and we need to remain
focused on it.
Punishment for the offensive behavior is not my field of
interest. That is up to others who understand the mechanisms designed and in
place to address punishment. My interest is in recovering the potential of the
individual and helping him or her get onto the right road for the future.
That is a difficult task in the context of a society irate
over the behavior in the first place. In my case, I have to separate the shock
of the offense in order to find the ordered pathway forward. Constructive
effort, you see. Always prefer constructive over complaint. Oh I get it;
complaint is a phase of recovery by society over the shock of the offense.
Complain is necessary. But so is recovery. That is what is lost in our nation,
today.
Penal institutions specialize in separating offenders from
the general society. During imprisonment, however, rehabilitation should be
present in most of the activities designed for the prisoners. I’m sure a lot of
this is in place, but I wonder how effective it is? Are the programs even followed? What are the outcomes?
Recidivism is the return to poor behavior. A repeating of
the offense even after the punishment and rehabilitation. Recidivism is high in
America. The outcomes of the penal system is poor. So something must be
missing. What might that be?
I suggest it is effective rehabilitation programs. I also
suggest the lack of such has much to do with poor budgets to support such
programs, and that leads to a low attraction to the field for professionally
trained people.
It cannot be easy dealing with offenders. But they are
people and need to be treated as such. Give them respect and they may work hard
to earn that respect for the future. That is a good beginning.
Discipline is both internal and external. The external is
experienced as punishment. The internal is a badge of honor worn privately by
the individual. If we expect ex-offenders to become model citizens, we must
prepare them for the role. It will take time. it will take an investment to
build a better life for them so they can build a better life within our
communities.
They have damaged communities. They will continue to do so
unless we help them reconstruct purposeful lives.
Question: are we actually doing this? And what investment
level must be present to do so?
May 31, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment