By the time I post this blog the Chicago teachers’ strike may
be settled. However, this upset to the scene in Chicago ’s schools raises some questions.
For over 40 years the Chicago Public School system was under its own
taxing district, board of education and administration. When the system ran
into financial difficulties, then Mayor Richard J. Daley would jump into the
fray and magically find the dollars to make the ills go away, or he would talk
privately with the principle players and problems were settled. The public
rarely knew what was said or what elements were agreed to for peace to reign.
But the Mayor was not in control directly of the schools so that they remained
out of the political manipulations other public arenas were subjected to.
Along comes Mayor Richie Daley (the
son of Richard J.) and the problems of the CPS have grown so large that he, the
Mayor, agreed to take the schools under the large umbrella of the City of
Chicago’s government. For several years
education reform was attempted and progress was noted. The teachers’ union was
not always pleased with the results but they went along to help be a part of
the solution, not a part of the problem.
Still years later, the problems
remain obvious: too costly a salary load for the budget, very little
improvement in productivity of the system, still too many teachers who perform
below par, and innovation grudgingly gained by sheer strength of personality
(some teachers, some principals, and the mayor). Still, the big productivity
and innovation gains were realized by charter schools and the entry of private
corporations into the educational mix.
Snail’s pace improvement costs a
lot: to the public, to the kids, to the competitive stance of the city and its
employers, to the city’s sense of self and pride.
Now comes Rahm Emanuel as the new
non-Daley mayor. He is fired up for reform: new forms of education to meet the
challenges of a diverse student population; innovative teaching methods that
fire up the teachers themselves and their sense of professionalism; removal of
underperforming teaching staff from the classroom where they endanger healthy
preparation of students for a new millennium. Emanuel also seeks strong budget
controls so the future price of public education is affordable and effective.
Standing in the way of all of this,
however, is the Chicago Teachers’ Union . Built
on political format of olden times, the CTU is remarkably out of step with the
modern labor movement. It is also counter to what the students need. And it is
severely out of focus with what the public can afford.
The CTU has been repeatedly invited
to the table in the past to create a new partnership with the city and the
school administration. The partnership was hoped to be innovative and
experimental while delivering the best education custom-made to the individual
needs of the diverse student body, at least as much as possible. But no. This
golden opportunity is spurned for: benefits, salaries and tenure standards. These
are the old sticking points. Why? Because they add up to unaffordable
obstructions to budget reality.
The schools must evolve to a new
format if they are to successfully prepare the next generation of students for
a productive and meaningful life. And then subsequent generations as well. The
old ways will not work any longer.
Educator Taylor Mali shared this
thought over the Internet the other day:
“What
teachers make//You want to know what I make?
I make kids wonder. I make them
question. I make them criticize. I make them apologize and mean it. I make them
write, write, write. And then I make them read. I make them spell definitely
beautiful, definitely beautiful, definitely beautiful, over and over and over
again until they will never misspell either one of those words again. I make
them show all their work in math, and hide it on their final drafts in English.
I make them understand that if you got this (brains) then you follow this
(heart) and if someone ever tries to judge you by what you make, you give them
this (the finger).”
Now that’s what I mean by
education. That professionalism of purpose and spirit. I wonder all the time if
the union in Chicago
allows or encourages such professional growth and success. The public thinks
not. The CTU needs to prove to the public that this is what they stand for and
are working towards. Until they do they will not have earned the public’s
support and loyalty for future teacher contracts.
Mayor Emanuel is right. School
reform is needed. Not for budget purposes, although that will likely be a
result. No; reform is needed so the kids have the best teachers and education
possible. That way they have a good chance to have a good life. And America has the
opportunity to build future years of innovation and exciting lives.
Hopefully this will be the result
of the most recent strike.
The root of the problem is simply poverty. Not enough tax money because of it and kids with disadvantages because of it: parents too busy making a living to sit down with homework or maybe not even able cuz the kids are past their education, food insecurity that affects ability to learn and concentrate, the low expectations bred by people in poverty and an impoverished built and natural environment.
ReplyDeletesome of the 'reform' is just busiwork. change for the sake of change. 20% of charter schools do better but 40% - FORTY PERCENT - twice as many - do worse. far better to just put in place the little things that make education better than to do the drama of making a whole new school and shifting resources and teachers and kids. mayor has right idea that reform is needed, but a laundry list of very wrong things. they need to look at the science of what really really works and put those little things into the existing sysem and stop with the big moves that the teachers intuitively know won't.