Living with other people nearby. In neighboring homes.
Yards. Abutting streets and blocks of homes. People who live in connection with
other people, knowing their kids, watching families grow up and away from the
area.
People connecting with people. Nodding at one another
walking down the street or meeting in a grocery aisle. Maybe at church, too, or
a concert at school in which their kids are co-participants. Maybe it’s at the
high school gym during a basketball game. Or a PTA meeting.
Little League games, youth football, soccer – whatever
activity that draws people together – there they meet and greet.
Knowing we are members of the same community. Sensing a
common link in our lives.
Towns, villages and cities share the same dynamics. Small
communities are more aware of those dynamics than larger towns or cities. We
see the same people many times over. We talk about happenings and realize how
they affect us – as well as how we affect the happenings!
Our neighborhoods thrive when we thrive. If we work to make
them good or even better, we recognize the cause and effect of those actions.
Same with town business. If we read the newspaper and understand the issues, or
are concerned about them, we have a voice in the discussions leading up to
decisions that affect us. We even can vote on these issues from time to time.
Certainly we vote frequently for the people we entrust with the business of our
community. The Fire District people; the Library organization; the Park District
and the City Council. Even the school board. We have voting rights and
opportunities. We exercise them. Choosing a person to get our vote in an
election is one thing; perhaps more important is understanding the issues those
elected people will have authority over to exercise what they think is right,
and how they should vote to support the well-being of the community. Those
issues are connected. Understanding them is difficult.
Elected officials are confronted on three levels of reality.
First are the facts of the situation – the operating considerations, personnel,
costs, regulations, hoped for results; second are the personalities and
professional viewpoints brought by the staff who work with the issues on a
daily basis and understand how they function in the big picture sense; and
third, the viewpoint and understanding of the electorate – the voting public.
Those three realities are very real. The problem arises when
all three are out of kilter with one another. The staff feels the long view
consideration demands action in one way, while the financial and regulatory
obligations present difficult realities to live with, and the voters don’t
understand all of that, and don’t feel they need to understand that. Yet
stability of the community is best served if all three realities are brought
into focus.
Voters elect people to handle their public business. They
authorize the officials to act for them. A board of commissioners, or Library
board of trustees or a city council is an elected board of directors charged
with the responsibility and authority to act in the stead of the voters.
The elected are given a position of trust to act for us. We
voters are given a position of trust to elect others to do our business. We are
in trusts; both are. Voters need to understand issues and persons well enough
to determine how well the business will be transacted over time.
These issues are not one time only. They exist in a
continuum of time. Managing issues in the now will affect the future. How well
we managed issues in the past defines the shape and urgency of the issues
today. Consistency of action and intelligent application of knowledge over time
makes a huge difference in public affairs.
We may not always agree with how elected officials vote in
any one situation. They always will make some people happy and others not
so! That is the nature of public work.
The yardstick on their performance is not in the present; it is in the longer
term.
Also, the work of the elected official is not done; it
continues. Voters do not always understand this. But they need to.
In the local community we can see the working parts of our
community life up close and personal. In county, state and national
‘communities’ we cannot see the working parts so easily. All the more reason to pay attention to the
local scene.
That is a valuable piece of why our community is important
to us. Are we paying attention?
January 22, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment