Women (all ages;
all backgrounds) 100 million adults
Young voters, ages 21
to 32 (20 million)
Educated voters
(college grads and post graduate degree holders) (20 million)
Midwest voters
(400 miles on either side of the Mississippi River, from Canada to
Missouri) (20 million)
West Coast voters
(20 million)
Northeast voters
(30 million)
The numbers estimated above total more than votes cast in
the 2016 Presidential Election. That’s because I’m focusing on blocs of people,
not voters. Not all will think or act the same as others in the bloc, but
focused on outcomes, my theory is more people will be energized to become
involved in the political process to accomplish shared goals of value. Thus,
the numbers are large. I’m counting on excitement among participating interest
groups to power the system forward.
Please note that political parties are so marginalized in
this format that they dwindle and die a lonely, pitiful end. Good riddance! The
parties simply have not garnered enough supporters for their overall cause;
rather, they have focused on interest groups which have not amassed supporters,
but divided
them. Thus the power of party has succumbed.
Now, let’s examine this template a bit more.
The template is most useful in determining strength of
support for various causes or goals. Outcomes, really, those that speak to the
people of what ought to be the result of their work together. Perhaps that is a
simpler, value driven immigration policy and process. Maybe it is
significant growth of women in management of private businesses. Another may
focus on healthcare access for all income segments of American households.
Whatever the outcome, the important thing is to focus just
on that outcome and work toward its achievement. This work should help raise
the public’s understanding of the issue and how it works within society
overall. How does it affect the overall well-being of the populace? From this
we gain a sense of priority within the mindset of the American public.
A sense of priority: this is missing in our public
discussions. We have a general sense of what matters to people, but not what
matters most, then lesser, and least. Ranking these issues is important. If we
concentrate on the most important issues and work on them until they are
satisfied, then we can go on to other issues and tackle them.
Currently, we don’t do this. All issues are dumped into the
same hopper of public discussion. This confuses and divides our attention. The
result is nothing much gets done. And gridlock continues to be served. Elected
officials and demagogues use this confusion to further divide and assemble
their own power. We must not let that happen!
I would love to see us develop this template as a working
model and see where it gets us. Anything would be better than the current
gridlock/power model.
What do you think? Should we try this new method? Would you
consider being a part of this?
January 24, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment