So disappointed the Boy Scouts of America have retained
their policy of no gays – either among the scouting ranks or in leadership
positions. They had an opportunity to redress their discriminatory policy. They
even claimed an open process two years long examined the policy from every
direction. Yet they came to the old conclusion again; unanimously no less.
Now, unanimous is hard to come by if the process were
totally open; and as exhaustive as their two year timeline suggests. Surely
someone with an opposing view would have voiced their position. With all the
national attention focused on the BSA over this issue, the public felt
encouragement to hope that an easing of the policy was imminent. But no; not to
be. Let us remember this national pressure has been ongoing for about five
years now.
Funny how that worked out. Seems to me that the process of
examination was not open and was not exhaustive.
The issue of pro or anti gay rests in the bedrock of their theology,
I think. If you are a conservative Christian and take the Bible literally, then
you see things that others don’t. You make your pronouncements based on
‘abominations’ you choose to focus on while omitting all of the ‘abominations’
listed in the Bible.
Biblical researchers will help you understand what the Bible
said back when it was written. Those researchers will help you understand the
culture of the time and what people believed and why. The researchers will also
tell you how language changed over the millennia and reshaped meanings of
phrases and words. Understanding the Bible in the language of 2012 is difficult
indeed.
If you care to really understand something you have to dig.
The lazy person relies on the words of others, the work of others, the lack of
questioning of others.
The BSA is in the control of fearful people. They love the
status quo. They play theologian and Biblical scholar without the credentials.
Last I understood the internal BSA management and leadership culture, the
Mormons had a lock on it all. If that remains true then it is easy to
understand how the BSA came to be this conservative, inward viewing organization. God and Country indeed!
I see America
as being inclusive. I view our nation as one which celebrates the uniqueness of
each individual. Ours is a country built on individuality, not lemming behavior
of follow the leader over the cliff! I also think the vast majority of
Americans believe in ‘live and let live.’ Who am I to judge the other? Why then
do they judge me?
The Mormons, and conservatives in general, seem to think
that gay people are predators. Why on earth would they think that? Do they
think straight people aren’t predators? At least some of them? Who are the
pedophiles? Are they mostly straight or mostly gay? Research tells us this is a
straight person’s problem. Sure there are gay pedophiles, but that does not
define all gay people, no more so than it defines all straight people.
There are gay teens in the BSA. They won’t tell you, but
they are there. There are gay scoutmasters; they won’t tell you but they are
there. They are there for the same reason that straight boys and scoutmasters
are there – to help other people develop healthy lives via the scouting
philosophy and educational mission. Scouting is good. It works. It should be
supported and embraced throughout the land.
But not as a discriminatory, head in the sand organization.
Such will only distort the young minds of the generations entrusted to the BSA
leadership. Shame on them.
If America
is good, and I think it is, and if the BSA is good, and I think it is, then
there is no room in either for discrimination. And petty ignorance.
If the BSA and its hoped for product of enlightened young
men is to live up to its promise, then it needs to get with the reality and
truth of the times. Else we train misfits.
What a waste of hope and principle.
July 20, 2012
It was a difficult decision to make as a parent to allow my kids to participate in Scouting. I am glad we did, as i beleive it did not less than change MY life for the better and give them skills and interests and friendships that will last a lifetime. However, I was always clear to them where OUR family stood on homosexuality. One son also managed to participate while being an atheist. Never an 'out' atheist of course, but there was room to complete requirements without doing things counter to his lack of religious belief. Both are Eagle Scout. I was sure when I allowed them to begin the journey in elementary school that this policy would soon change. Back then, it seemed like one of those things like racism that no politicina could ever openly support. Then somehow they stirred it all up with this liar-language of 'preservation of marriage' and confused even good people into voting on their side out of fear of something that might be there. This all makes me very sad. Something is wrong when things that should count as hate speach are said by conservative politicians every day.
ReplyDeleteWhile this decision saddens me, I think we would join BSA again as a family. You can take advantage of a flawed entity and take from it what you value and reject what you despise, just as you can be friends with persons that have good and unsavory aspects of their personalities. It would be easier if the flaws weren't there, but that does not diminish the benefits of outdoor skills, environmental attitudes, self-sufficiency, confidence, and teamwork that Scouting offers.