OK, this was not a good week. On Tuesday I sat in a
management team meeting for our small town newspaper. The three of us own and
operate the paper, although assets are non-existent and profits are even rarer.
But, we have always run the paper because the community needed and deserved it.
A non-profit, all-volunteer organization, the Village Chronicles has been
operating in one form or another for nearly seven years.
We began as a paper of positive voice and tone. We avoided
the ‘gotcha’ behavior of so many publications. We wanted to chronicle the town
as it is and encourage it to be all that it can be. Some people thought we were
namby pamby, but hey, they weren't doing the work or paying the bills.
Our print run is 13,000 and 10,700 copies are mailed to
each home and business in two communities. The rest are dropped at 35 or 40
locations with high traffic – restaurants, hotels, city halls, etc. No
subscriptions were sold. Donations and ad sales were the sole source of revenue
for the paper. And we maintained a low profit in politics. We didn't pick
sides, didn't endorse candidates for public office; we do offer columns that
explain controversies to educate the public so they would better
understand what was going on in their local seats of government and make sense
of the issues on their own.
Unfortunately one of our management team ran for city
council a few years ago and withdrew. He had carved out an agenda for election
that was decidedly not positively voiced, we argued that point with him. We
didn't think his message was in keeping with the role and voice of the
newspaper.
He is currently running for office again. Same agenda and
same voice. We began the battle with him again. Even withheld publishing a column
he had written. That edition was published fairly clean but a few items
remained and the public reacted.
For his part he was upset that we would question his
judgment and informed us Tuesday that he was resigning from the paper effective
after the publication of our April issue. Just before the election.
Over the past weekend I was realizing that our disagreement
with him had made me very uncomfortable. Although I feel our policy decision is
sound, I realized the confrontation among friends who have worked together for
nearly seven years ‘doing the impossible’ was destroying my will to remain with
the newspaper. So I decided I would resign from the paper independent of my
fellow team members.
He beat me to the resignation announcement!
So now the issue is more complex. For the short term, the
paper could have survived my absence. The long term is another matter. But my
team member also serves as our ad sales manager, IT manager and accountant. For
the short term someone would have to step in and do that work as well.
I knew I was not able to do so. So the reality is: the paper
will cease to exist in early April.
Two losses are taking place. A friendship on the one hand,
and the newspaper on the other. Both are important to me. Both are
irreplaceable.
The friendship loss is very personal and will not affect
anyone else. But the loss of the paper will be felt by the entire community. At
this point they don’t know this is happening. Even when they do learn of it,
they will likely yawn and not be moved by it. A few weeks later, however, and
something in the community’s life will be missed. At first they won’t be able
to put their finger on it, but eventually they will know that a vital
communication link has been lost. The community’s personality will likely shift a bit,
too.
I think another important thing is this simple reality: a volunteer,
non-profit entity formed to serve community needs failed to survive because no
one stepped forward to help when needed. I have been seeking a managing editor
to replace me. No takers. Our ad revenues are too low to afford hiring
professional staff. Too much competition from non-print communication channels
don’t you know? All in all this is not a good time for print journalism. Most
newspapers are struggling financially. So are we.
If a community has difficulty forming volunteer groups to
perform necessary services at no or low cost, then the community suffers. This
is a symptom that needs to be addressed. Then too, the state of public
discourse is in need of repair. Incivility is all too present. Opinion rules
fact and logic. Meaningful dialog is thus hampered perhaps blocked entirely.
Such is not good for the long term help of any community.
We are not afraid of the future; but we are alarmed for it.
Meanwhile, those of us close to the newspaper will lick our wounds for both our
losses: friendships and newspaper.
May our efforts not have been in vain!
February 12, 2015
Sorry to hear about this. I know the paper was not just a paper, but a reflection of what you do so well and is a rarity in our times - informed and civil conversation.
ReplyDeleteWell said. Volunteer groups can't be sustained without new blood. As hard as it is, we sometimes have to let go.
ReplyDelete