So a customer comes into your store and expresses interest
in a product you have on display. You show it to her. She feels it, maybe tries
it on, asks questions about it, and makes the decision to buy or not at that moment.
You offer a product. Customer shows interest in it. A reaction is expressed.
Action to buy we don’t know at this point, and probably is not the point of
this post.
No, getting a reaction is often unintentional but in the mix
of daily life just the same. Brrr its cold outside! Ugh, it’s hot and humid outdoors. Isn’t she
pretty, or he handsome? Nice. We react bidden or not. Of value or not is not
even in the calculation.
Others, however, take action precisely to get a reaction. A
nation builds a strong defense to thwart threat of take over or attack.
Sometimes the strong defense attracts challenges and minor skirmishes. Were the
latter intended by the defender? Or was this intended by the challenger, to get
a rise out of the defender. Sounds like
the old Cold War to me. Maybe, maybe not.
Today China
is building islands, yes islands, in straits off their mainland to shorten the
distance between their shore and a targeted piece of real estate they feel
belongs to their national identity. So yes, they are actually raising the sea
floor high enough to build tiny land spits that will eventually become the core
of a small island. They built it so they will name it and claim it as theirs.
Evidently this is a tactic to expand their defined sea lanes
so international waters are pushed farther off. Interesting. Prior to the ‘land
mass in the making’, it is not actually a nationalized land. So international
waters remain as before.
The US Navy has
cruised through the area and China now claims the US is causing trouble,
engaging in ‘provocations’, I think they said.. They claim the US has entered China ’s waters in violation of
international law.
I think not. Most others in the global community would agree
that China
is constructing a shadow issue. For what reason? Only they know. Meanwhile
others are curious. No action is taken, imagined or otherwise. Just curious
cruise-bys and maintaining open international waters regardless of what China
claims.
So, have they taken an action to create a reaction? Maybe so. What else is the world to think?
Same with Russia :
Crimea was a staged take-over disguised as a
civil uprising. And they did this in the shadow of hosting the Olympics.
Followed swiftly by their hostile actions in Ukraine . Staged actions to create
reactions. A test, if you will, of the temper of the western nations and how
they would counter Russia ’s
bold actions.
The west responded with diplomacy, behind the scenes
negotiations and posturing. Such are the tools used to maintain peace and keep
a hot war from happening of any size.
Political campaigns do the same action/reaction engineering.
It is a way to get your name and ‘brand’ in front of the press and the public.
Good or bad imaging, the issue is being controlled by someone for their own
gain. The truth doesn’t matter at this point. Provocations are manipulative
regardless of who does it. Has America used such a tactic? I don’t know but
probably it has. But China , Russia , Iran
and Syria
certainly have. And of course Russia
claims Turkey
has done so by shooting down the Russian fighter jet although so far the proof
shows the jet strayed into Turkish territory even after several warnings.
That’s what happens – mistake or not – when hostile actions are taken in small
regions. National boundaries are not printed on the soil as on a map! The location of a
plane in flight is not always known precisely by the pilot and crew. But the
folks on the ground know.
Actions and reactions staged for effect. We see this in
advertising as well, personal relationship management, too. Some people are
naturally pushy; we label that controlling. They act this way to force their
interests to the fore in a negotiation or power play. They may be viewed as effective
by some parties, but others will label them bullies. And that’s what they are.
Bullies. We see them on the highway, city streets, and even
on the sidewalks. Over-important thugs dressed in suits and ties pushing their
way around. The NRA does this to master its public relations challenge
concerning gun rights. They are successful, too.
Same in congress and the Illinois legislature. Regardless of the facts, parties are stating
what they want people to believe as though it is fact. It isn’t. and so they
get away with doing nothing while blaming someone else for the problem.
But the work remains to be done. And I for one am
watching them manipulate issues and thinking they are growing their own cover. However, they are in the open and nude of such cover. We know they are doing this.
When will we remove them so dedicated public servants finally get the job done?
Indeed.
December 22, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment