Too, what a buyer needs in layout and features is not always
available in existing housing stock. They need customized features: access for
physical disabilities, wider doors for wheelchair access, single floor homes or
multi story with elevator, specialized bathrooms to fit specific needs, number
of bedrooms to accommodate the family’s size, etc.
Now add the need for multi-generations. Either the kids are
returning to the parents’ homestead, or parents are sharing living space at the
kids’ home. Sometimes it is elderly aunts and uncles, or brothers and sisters
with financial or health problems. Any way the issue is phrased, more flexible
housing options are needed.
Another dimension to the problem: empty homes often cause
blight to a neighborhood. What do we do with these homes? How do we sensibly
absorb these properties in a way that respects the property and the
neighborhood, yet provides housing opportunities to those with needs?
Yet another dimension of the problem: economic dislocation
of young and old populations caught between careers or at the end of a career.
These are people who do not have adequate employment to cover housing costs for
the family. The re-pricing of wages and benefits has pulled the rug out from
under these families and their homes were repossessed. How can we hold these
families together with dignity and nurture to find new opportunities for future
success and self sufficiency?
What about the citizens who have experienced major health
problems and costs, lost their nest eggs, and their retirement benefits, and
now face loss of homes?
The problem outlined above is huge. It is not easily solved.
Not by government, nor industries – banking, mortgage, construction, to name a
few – nor by communities alone. Yet, strangely, it is the community that is
most likely the entity best qualified to lead the way in solving the problem.
They cannot do it alone; they will need support along the way from investors,
government agencies, charities, churches and neighbors. Here’s how I envision it:
·
Neighborhoods are organic. They rely on
interactions of people living in close proximity to one another. Their lives
interleave with one another in schooling, child rearing, dramas of illness and
death, injury and career success, well-being and the many changes over time.
They know each other. Their well-being matters, as does ours with them.
·
Communities are grids of neighborhoods
interconnected organically. The neighborhoods come together to form church
parishes, school attendance areas, and shopping patterns. Shared errands tie
families together the same way as school classmates do; they bump into each
other in the routine compartments of their lives. Our life boundaries change,
shift and grow over the years. These define not only who I am, but who we are.
·
Homes define neighborhoods. Their aspirations,
their accomplishments, their tastes, their people. Cute, neighborly, spacious,
modest or grand.
·
Neighbors and communities know each other’s
needs. We are not islands living separate lives, but living in modified
communal collections throughout the village. We know when someone is sick and
needs a visit or a casserole. We know when divorce has challenged the family
with child care during the day when the only bread earner is out and about
earning the bacon. We know who needs help and how to do that.
·
Housing is a core need for a family. We take it
for granted during good times, and we have had unheralded good times for
generations now. Current conditions belie that peace. Our communities and
neighborhoods are in turmoil. We have work to do.
Close knit communities have a lot going for them. They know
themselves, their people, their needs, their potential and their resources.
Pulling them all together will be easier for the community than for an
outsider.
Here’s how an action plan could come together. The
components need to be identified.
- Who are the stakeholders that can provide leadership?
- Citizenry
- Municipal governments
- Local charities and service organizations
- Churches
- County and State programs
- Federal programs
- Who are the citizens in need? Categorize them broadly as target markets or groups
- Single parent families
- Low income/unemployed/underemployed
- Elder retired/low fixed income
- Other?
- What housing stock is available?
- Multiple family units
- Apartment units
- Condominium units
- Single family units
- Where is this housing stock located?
- Block and street
- Zones or areas
- Proximity to target groups with needs?
- How diverse is the housing stock by zone or area? (mixed use, large/small, etc.)
- List household needs other than housing
- Income
- Child care
- Adult day care
- Tutoring/education
- Other?
A leadership group needs to be identified to process all of
the above. The possibilities and options for the future need to be brainstormed
and listed. Choosing which options to pursue and in what priority order is an
early step in organizing the program.
The next big step is studying the component parts of the
problems and gathering information and expertise. As this work progresses the
programmatic elements begin to take shape. Around each of those programs an
organizing team needs to be recruited and asked to determine how and if the
program can be organized and inaugurated.
As each program proposal takes substantive form, the
leadership group needs to determine which programs should be created first, and
which building blocks need to be acquired to make them all work together and be
successful for the long term objectives.
Funding resources will need examination and research.
Working partners interested in performing the work will need to be recruited.
The research and study of the program elements outlined earlier will help in
this stage of the work.
The end result hoped for? A community housing program that
helps the community manage toward healthy outcomes for quality of life for its
citizens, housing patterns, and diverse housing stock.
Affordable and self-sustaining housing is a core issue for
healthy communities. How well are we managing this important aspect of
community life in the America
of 2012?
March 16, 2012
Our city government is solving all the housing issues for us. They purchased a run down home in a nice neighborhood, razed it, and built a brand new home. The total cost to the taxpayer (combination of local tax "revenue" and federal grants) was in the $200,000 neighborhood - just about what the existing home values WERE in that neighborhood.
ReplyDeleteThe city UNLOADED the house for $127,000 AND provided an additional $5,000 grant to cover the closing costs. Some lucky people got a new home in a great neighborhood for practically no money down - paid for by the rest of us - including the people in the neighborhood who just saw their home value plummet because of the "new" comp rate generated by that sale.
Hip. Hip. Booooo.