Talk with family members. Listen to them. Clarify what they
say so you are sure you understand their message. By doing so you demonstrate
to them you are paying attention. You
don’t have to agree with what they are saying; just understand their point.
When it’s your turn, state your thoughts on the topic. Be
sure they are listening to you and understanding your point. They don’t have to
agree with you. But if they take the conversation elsewhere, controlling it, maybe
even arguing about it, change to safer topics. Do not talk further about the
issue at hand unless the other person demonstrates a willingness to proceed
calmly.
If no alternative discussion is possible, leave the room,
the building, whatever. Nothing you say will register with the other party and
both of you will become frustrated and angry.
Communication can be face to face, over the phone, in print
by letter or email. The same rules apply. Someone makes a statement. You
indicate you understand and feed back a little to demonstrate your
understanding. The other party does the same when you make a statement. If
there is an argument or hassle in place of communication, cut off the talk
immediately. Nothing will be accomplished; only resentment and a platform for
future disagreement and argument.
Family members seem to have the most trouble with this.
Emotions run close to the surface. Why? Don’t
know, but probably because there is an assumption of understanding and support;
when that is absent there is hurt and the need to express it. The fight comes
unless the respondent absorbs the attack and deflects it, calms the waters, and
continues to discuss the matter logically. Still, emotions can and usually do
disrupt the communication.
I’ve watched these interchanges up close for many years. It
is easier when the family is not directly yours by blood; there is more room
for perspective. There is a chance to understand the players and why they are
acting up with each other.
Some families are feisty. They interact with gusto and
brashness. For those not used to this style, it is upsetting and disrupting.
Good humor usually saves the day, but sometimes that is not possible.
I’ve watched in-law relationships and am stunned at the
level of hurt hurled at each other. And at times I’ve been dragged into the
fray unwillingly. Still my perspective is probably more realistic than theirs. The
older I get, the more I withdraw from the fight unless I’m engaged in making
peace between a few combatants.
My own sibling relationships have been frayed for years. Not
much direct talk has been engaged to dispel the upset. So it brews beneath the
surface for decades. That’s how my family handles it. Very little direct
discussion of the topics. Keep the surface calm and mask the disruption to keep
the waters calm. Trouble is: rancor and resentment have fertile ground in which
to grow and multiply!
My siblings and I were raised as critical thinkers. That
should mean that we are able to think on various topics and make reasonable
conclusions about their truth and honesty; their representativeness of reality.
It does not mean that we are supposed to criticize everyone and everything.
As I get older I fume less. I still fume and rant
occasionally but I don’t fly off the handle as quickly as I once did. I also
learned that if my siblings aren’t willing to talk calmly about something then
it is best to leave it alone. Over the years, we discuss weather in great
detail! Not much else of value is talked about. Pity.
I see the same in other families. It’s a pity because they
need each other. They care about each other. If they didn’t they would walk
away. Completely. At some point, however, building bridges is fruitless. I
don’t know who gets to decide that but it may be you if the toll on your
serenity is disruptive with no gain toward peace.
The Hatfields and the McCoys is a good model to avoid.
June 20, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment