I was at a meeting the other day. People were struggling to
understand the complexities of economic development within our town.
Professional consultants in the field led the workshop. Elected leaders of the
town were the primary participants, but so too were the senior staff of the
city. The latter are immersed in the day to day operations of the city and have
career-long concerns about what is emerging on the horizon for their areas of
expertise.
These people know how to run their departments with the
current resources. They can well imagine times when those resources will be
either absent or in short supply. Yet another scenario: resources will be
plentiful to solve future problems because they have prepared for them, positioned
the community to acquire the necessary resources and, quite importantly,
planned in depth for alternative scenarios should things not work out as well
as hoped.
I turned to a colleague who has academic credentials at
college level. He thinks as deeply as I on matters of public concern. He
wonders what impact current decisions will have on the community, and I wonder
how we can make decisions that will improve and sustain the community and its
dreams of the future.
He and I agreed that there exists a method of discussing
highly interdependent topics that benefit from one another. The symposium panel
is the magical tool. Here’s how it
works.
First, the topic to be discussed is selected. Next, a list
of specialists, maybe even experts, in a cross section of areas having impact
on the selected topic, are gathered to discuss the topic. The actual discussion
to follow will share knowledge of each area of expertise. Assumptions and
conclusions that appear to be of central importance in understanding the topic,
problem, and possible solutions, are aired. Those ideas which emerge as
consensus are recorded. From this consensus comes the conscious formation of
questions which the group feels must be researched and answered if meaningful
progress on solving topical problems are to be found.
It is important to recognize that consensus is not 100%
agreement but rather a general agreement on matters that can be used to further
research and think out the areas of discussion. Also, pre-eminence of one field
over another is strictly avoided; each area is allowed its own importance of
value and function as it relates to solving the area under discussion.
A final item of importance is this: the group’s progress
toward finding workable solutions to a problem is based on its ability to work
together as harmonious as possible while colliding ideas eventually work
towards conclusions that are sustainable for the long term.
It is this process of respect for ideas and logical thinking
that leads to practical application of education, knowledge and expertise to
solving problems worth solving for the common good.
Example: energy consumed by the globe is nearly entirely
dependent on fossil fuels. Modern physics, on the other hand, are well aware of
alternate energy sources having nothing to do with fossil fuels. Inasmuch as
fossil fuels currently deplete the planet’s resources and place in peril the
quality of our air, water and soil, doesn't it seem well worth our while to
move determinedly toward the new energy sources? Shouldn't we be researching these sources and
determine if they can be safely used without producing major, offsetting side
effects? Currently atomic energy produces atomic wastes which are deadly to
human life. Are there means to eliminate the harmful attributes of the wastes
or use them for alternate purposes while neutralizing their harmful effects?
The latter has been under study for decades. Progress has
been made. Breakthroughs are tantalizingly near at times but funding for
conclusive research remains elusive. When it is understood that such energy
resources may very well cause electric, natural gas and automotive industries
major dislocations and disinvestment, it is no wonder that politicians protect
the old industries while hampering the research which may very well solve
enormous problems for mankind.
I dream that this industrial protectionism disappears. If we
Americans believe in free markets, then the market of free ideas should be
allowed to take us to new heights. As gasoline, oil and other energy prices
rise to reflect scarcity of supplies, then alternate energy is needed to
maintain public safety and order. It is a function of government to do this. It
is not a function of government to protect industries from changing costs
associated with change.
I dream that the people’s work will be accomplished with
open minds and safety ensured. This will require decision makers to be focused
on long term results not short term benefits of key players.
Such is true in health, energy, education, defense and
commerce. These are the basic endeavors to ensure quality life of our citizens.
Why are finance, politics and ideology allowed to obstruct mankind’s progress?
Now that would make for an interesting symposium!
March 5, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment