After 9/11 – the defining moment of national terrorism in
American terms – public discussion came to consider nation building. There were
problems in the Middle East and Africa, South America ,
and other regions.
In the Middle East of course we were concerned with Al Qaida
in Afghanistan , Saudi Arabia , Yemen ,
Iraq and Iran as well as many other countries – Egypt , Libya ,
Syria ,
etc.
African countries were struggling as well. So many small
nations yearning to sustain their special way of life. Others failing massively
on health concerns alone, let alone economic and political stability.
Yes we were concerned about the status of many countries and
we wondered aloud whether we should help these nations survive and succeed.
Indeed there were many then and now which we knew were tottering toward
oblivion. The concern was not just humane living conditions, but also for
political stability of entire regions. Stability which safeguarded American
interests globally and at home.
Did we have a responsibility to get involved? Did we have an
imperative to be involved?
Many suggested not! Others said yes, do help these
struggling nations along.
Trouble was we didn’t know who the good guys were. Still
don’t. Situational elements inform us of needs and risks to the local
population and what they produce for the world and America . Do we need their products?
Do we need their stability? What will fill the voids should they fail. And will
this risk our safety in geopolitical terms?
It became the aim of America during the George W. Bush
presidency to build nations. For geopolitical purposes. And we did get
involved. In many places, mostly the Middle East .
The record is not good. We bought time to strengthen our
allies and self interests but we did little to build lasting national
infrastructures. Observe if you kindly will, the condition of Iraq and Afghanistan . Both are not stable.
Both are not at peace internally or externally. Global politics impact those
regions daily. It is not just Middle Eastern politics but global politics which
drive these concerns. Global economics is part of the formula. Human living
conditions is another. The peril of the unknown future 30 or 50 years from now
beckons our interest as well.
No; we have not done well building nations. Friendly ones
like Egypt and Saudi Arabia
turn out to be less friendly, less an ally to our interests. As well they
should; they have their own internal interests to govern and support.
It seems to me nation building belongs to the people of the
nation that is or will become, not America . We can build commercial
networks. We can build human care supports for food, health and education. We
can do these things because we care, because our philosophy and spiritual
underpinnings require us to do so as fellow human beings.
But as political and ideological purveyors we ought not be
involved.
Rather we have our own work to do. Right here at home.
Generations of citizens needing our care and nurture.
Ought we tend our own gardens? Now?
March 19, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment